Create 2018-08-20--go-core-dev-team-weekly.md #683
Conversation
ghost
assigned 
| @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ | |||
| # 💫Golang Core Dev Team Weekly Sync 🙌🏽 August 20, 2018 | |||
|
|
|||
| - **Lead:** Dominic Della Valle | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@djdv thank you for hosting ❤️
|
|
||
| - **Lead:** Dominic Della Valle | ||
| - **Notetaker:** | ||
| - @bigs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bigs thank you for notetaking 🌟
| - @kevina | ||
| - @hsanjuan | ||
| - @Magik6k | ||
| - **Recording:** _add link to recording once it's online_ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note, we need to say that the recording is private to the Go Core Dev Team
| - Refined the IPFS on fuse implementation | ||
| - Added caching around things like pins, keys, and metadata | ||
| - Reduced lock contention | ||
| - Reworked how indexes are generated and referenced |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@djdv Can you do a demo of it working on Windows? @hacdias will be excited about it for IPFS Desktop for sure and @alanshaw will be able to give it a new spin with https://www.npmjs.com/package/ipfs-fuse
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have an informal demo of the original implementation here: ipfs/kubo#5003 (comment)
The refinement is the same, just much faster.
I plan to do a proper demo when this is closer to completion (still working on write support).
| - This was resolved while refactoring | ||
| - Currently I'm dealing with an issue related to file ownership | ||
| - I am currently in contact with the cgofuse developer about it | ||
| - Currently working around this by setting everything to 0777, later node owners will be the same as the process owner/invoker |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@djdv anything that anyone in the Go Core Dev Team or PL can do to help here or is this under your control? Just let me know :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Things should be good for the moment ;^)
|
|
||
| @kevina | ||
| - Done: | ||
| - In Progress: Begin new "cid" sub-command https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/5385 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@kevina Is this for CIDv0 to CIDv1 migration? Please create an issue on http://github.com/ipfs/specs so that the other IPFS implementations and Client libraries can keep up.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This was something that I consider go specific and something I want to put into a spec. One of the things it does is to provide a way to convert CIDs to base32 CIDv1. I considered making it a separate utility but that will be a separate binary that might not be installed. If it was part of go-ipfs it is nearly guaranteed to be available when if its a separate utility
| - multistream-select (again) | ||
| - continue work on IPLD interfaces/migration. | ||
| - Blocked: | ||
| - @daviddias: [Remove bitswap unwant](https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/5308) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Followed up, here ipfs/kubo#5308 (comment)
| - continue work on IPLD interfaces/migration. | ||
| - Blocked: | ||
| - @daviddias: [Remove bitswap unwant](https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/5308) | ||
| - @daviddias: [New multiaddr protocol](https://github.com/multiformats/multiaddr/pull/68) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've followed up. Feel that I need to do lot more reading before signing off such a thing (lot's of RFCs to read and context to absorb) and unfortunately I've very limited time right now to go that deep exploring.
Can you give me a date in which this becomes critical to not be solved? Or, better, can do you a 5 minute presentation with your brain dump?
| - @daviddias: [Remove bitswap unwant](https://github.com/ipfs/go-ipfs/pull/5308) | ||
| - @daviddias: [New multiaddr protocol](https://github.com/multiformats/multiaddr/pull/68) | ||
| - Ask: | ||
| - Please review PRs! |
| - Blocked: | ||
| - Next: | ||
|
|
||
| @bigs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@bigs, Did you get to meet with @jacobheun and @travisperson? Ref https://github.com/ipfs/pm/pull/678/files#r210003491
| - Waffle cleanup | ||
| - Continue developing go/js/rust interop demo | ||
| - Docs improvement SOW and interviews | ||
| - Rust dev shop SOWs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mgoelzer I don't have any particular thing against sharing this kind of update here, but have in mind that this is a call focused for Dev of the Go implementations of IPFS, libp2p and IPLD and not for PM'ing or Protocol Labs
No description provided.